Thursday, June 28, 2012

High Tech Socialism?

An anonymous commenter said this of my previous post:
I can't help but think that a future such as this would provide us with more jobless citizens.
A few weeks ago, I had a fascinating conversation with a college professor. His specialty is social media such as Facebook and Twitter. One would think that being a tenured professor is as close to full-proof job security as it gets. Yet, he was terrified of losing his job. As someone in the field he is fully aware of the potential of technological progress. He related to me that there already exists technology that would allow a few charismatic professors to spread their knowledge to the masses over the Internet, thereby eliminating the need for all the others. Case in point is Udacity which offers many classes for free. It's only a matter of time before institutions such as Udacity receive accreditation thereby making quality education much more accessible and affordable.

Yes, people in diverse fields such as college professors, waiters, pharmacists, taxi drivers and even DJs are in danger of getting the pink slip from their employers. Some fields will become much more competitive for humans, while others will be completely dominated by machines. In fact, it is quite possible that most of us, or even all of us would end up losing their jobs thanks to the coming changes.  The question then becomes, what would a jobless society look like?

Before I attempt to answer this question, I would like to state that this blog is not intended for a political discussion.  I will only attempt to explain things the way I see them and you are free to agree or disagree with me.  

As my personal friends know, I am a strong supporter of free market capitalism.  Free market capitalism has created an unprecedented level of prosperity in societies that successfully adopted it.  In fact, it is the driving force behind technological progress.  The reason capitalism works is because it gives a strong incentive to work and contribute to society by utilizing a basic human instinct: greed. Socialist societies, on the other hand, never took greed into account and therefore have consistently failed. This has been the situation up until now. Up until now and for a long time to come human labor has been and will be valuable. However, as technology progresses human labor will gradually lose its value. There will be fewer opportunities for many skilled workers, and ever fewer for unskilled ones. The resulting unemployment may lead to social unrest, unless governments implement social programs to help the unemployed, which would certainly be a step toward socialism.

One of the goals of socialism is equality, whereas capitalism creates and thrives on inequality. It is both greed and inequality that serve as an incentive for workers to try to succeed and move up the social ladder. But what happens when human labor is partially or completely replaced by machines? What is the point of allocating resources unequally in a such a society? Greed and inequality can no longer serve as incentives to contribute to society simply because there is no way to compete with the machines.  And distributing resources equally is synonymous with socialism.  Will socialism be the product of capitalism-driven technological progress? Oh the irony.

10 comments:

  1. When farming became mechanized thousands of people were terrified of losing their jobs. What they did not realize was that more jobs would open up for people making farm equipment. And cars. And airplanes. What will be some of the new needs for college professors?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I don't think that college professors will be in soup kitchen lines any time soon. :) There would always have opportunities, such as tutoring, material preparation, etc. Many of them have the option of switching to private sector jobs.

      Delete
  2. Wow, great answer and terrific structure. Perhaps, that's the way the future will have to unfold. Technology, I believe isn't supposed to be the downfall of man, it's meant to improve. Therefore, I think with this new future you're discussing it will definitely open doors for its inhabitants to thrive. You've officially convinced me. :)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you for your kind words! I agree, even though technology can be abused by a few (i.e. computer viruses and credit card scams), overall it has been and will be extremely beneficial.

      Delete
  3. Too rosy a picture. It'll be dystopian, the problems too great to overcome.
    Technological control in the hands of the few will be oppression for the masses.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Rudy, thank you for your perspective. You just gave me an idea for my next post. :-)

      Delete
  4. Hi there, interesting points on the so-called free market ideology but I must strongly disagree with it. Here is an excellent article from Alternet: http://www.alternet.org/economy/155750/why_don't_we_have_flying_cars_how_capitalism_steered_innovation_toward_social_control_rather_than_technological_wonders/
    that i recommend reading about the lack of progress in fact of the Free Market Capitalism ideology.
    But I will leave politics aside as, as you pointed out, this is not a political blog.
    I think that if we look at history we always had jobs disappearing. But we also always had new trades appearing which had to be created for their time. So if we say that there is noone working in car factories anymore in a few years, a new profession could be born which is meant for its time (robot repairs? lol).

    ReplyDelete
  5. Yo man, keep the blogs coming!

    ReplyDelete
  6. Why you no more blog?

    ReplyDelete